Comments on: Doctor Who Magazine #430 new look cover revealed

By: DRWHO

DRWHO — Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:45:51 +0000

YAY! The official cover of pt 2 of dwm special …. love it

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:00:03 +0000

and karen/amy is turning more abd more into rachel from friends more

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:59:07 +0000

so glad that the time team are back. it’ll be very interesting to see how different their views are to the 21st century eps.

By: TSG

TSG — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:02:34 +0000

@TWWL Mm, I agree. It would be a shame if DWM were, for want of a better phrase, 'dumbed down'. The 'older', more wordy articles, which would never appear in DWA, are the best ones. I think the old look was better.

By: TWWL

TWWL — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:51:09 +0000

@TE I think DWM has changed more than enough already to try and appeal to the new, younger fans since the show came back; I hope it isn't slipping even further down that route. Like you say, a magazine for very young readers already exists now, lets keep DWM for older readers. (I don't mean kids shouldn't read it, I used to read DWM as a ten year old, so it's not as though you need to appeal to young fans by trying to give it more 'youth appeal')

By: TE

TE — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:21:45 +0000

@TWWL I wouldn't say that. It's more like they're trying to steal the children from Doctor Who Adventures and become the supreme Doctor Who magazine. To be honest though, I don't see the need for a new look about eleven months after the last new-look featured.

By: TWWL

TWWL — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:55:12 +0000

It’s a bit busy, really; and you can tell they’re aiming it at the younger market.

By: Eliott

Eliott — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:51:20 +0000

This Looks Brilliant, has it actually been confirmed that the collector cards are regulars to the magazine or is it just for a few issue? :)

By: Teamfez!

Teamfez! — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:23:45 +0000

@Tom It's £4.50 monthly now. That's what it said on the back page of the last issue.

By: Tom

Tom — Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:21:31 +0000

Or for just this issue anyway…